11-11-04

"How soon is now"

Room temperature!

09:19 Gepost door GMT +1/+2 (c) 2006 The dog --- WHAT'S YOUR OPINION? / WAT IS UW GEDACHT? | Permalink | Commentaren (1) |  Facebook |

Commentaren

In de Boston Globe Arafat the monster

By Jeff Jacoby, Globe Columnist | November 11, 2004

YASSER ARAFAT died at age 75, lying in bed surrounded by familiar faces. He left this world peacefully, unlike the
thousands of victims he sent to early graves.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a better world, the PLO chief would have met his end on a gallows, hanged for mass murder much as the Nazi chiefs
were hanged at Nuremberg. In a better world, the French president would not have paid a visit to the bedside of such a
monster. In a better world, George Bush would not have said, on hearing the first reports that Arafat had died, "God bless
his soul."

God bless his soul? What a grotesque idea! Bless the soul of the man who brought modern terrorism to the world? Who
sent his agents to slaughter athletes at the Olympics, blow airliners out of the sky, bomb schools and pizzerias, machine-gun
passengers in airline terminals? Who lied, cheated, and stole without compunction? Who inculcated the vilest culture of
Jew-hatred since the Third Reich? Human beings might stoop to bless a creature so evil -- as indeed Arafat was blessed,
with money, deference, even a Nobel Prize -- but God, I am quite sure, will damn him for eternity.

Arafat always inspired flights of nonsense from Western journalists, and his last two weeks were no exception.

Derek Brown wrote in The Guardian that Arafat's "undisputed courage as a guerrilla leader" was exceeded only "by his
extraordinary courage" as a peace negotiator. But it is an odd kind of courage that expresses itself in shooting unarmed
victims -- or in signing peace accords and then flagrantly violating their terms.

Another commentator, columnist Gwynne Dyer, asked, "So what did Arafat do right?" The answer: He drew worldwide
attention to the Palestinian cause, "for the most part by successful acts of terror." In other words, butchering innocent human
beings was "right," since it served an ulterior political motive. No doubt that thought brings daily comfort to all those who
were forced to bury a child, parent, or spouse because of Arafat's "successful" terrorism.

Some journalists couldn't wait for Arafat's actual death to begin weeping for
him.TaketheBBC'sBarbaraPlett,whoburstintotearson the day he was airlifted out of the West Bank. "When the helicopter
carrying the frail old man rose above his ruined compound," Plett reported from Ramallah, "I started to cry." Normal people
don't weep for brutal murderers, but Plett made it clear that her empathy for Arafat -- whom she praised as "a symbol of
Palestinian unity, steadfastness, and resistance" -- was heartfelt:

"I remember well when the Israelis re-conquered the West Bank more than two years ago, how they drove their tanks and
bulldozers into Mr. Arafat's headquarters, trapping him in a few rooms, and throwing a military curtain around Ramallah. I
remember how Palestinians admired his refusal to flee under fire. They told me: `Our leader is sharing our pain, we are all
under the same siege.' And so was I." Such is the state of journalism at the BBC, whose reporters do not seem to have any
trouble reporting, dry-eyed, on the plight of Arafat's victims. (That is, when they mention them -- which Plett's teary bon
voyage to Arafat did not.)

And what about those victims? Why were they scarcely remembered in this Arafat death watch?

How is it possible to reflect on Arafat's most enduring legacy -- the rise of modern terrorism -- without recalling the legions
of men, women, and children whose lives he and his followers destroyed? If Osama bin Laden were on his deathbed,
would we neglect to mention all those he murdered on 9/11?

It would take an encyclopedia to catalog all of the evil Arafat committed. But that is no excuse for not trying to recall at
least some of it.

Perhaps his signal contribution to the practice of political terror was the introduction of warfare against children. On one
black date in May 1974, three PLO terrorists slipped from Lebanon into the northern Israeli town of Ma'alot. They
murdered two parents and a child whom they found at home, then seized a local school, taking more than 100 boys and
girls hostage and threatening to kill them unless a number of imprisoned terrorists were released. When Israeli troops
attempted a rescue, the terrorists exploded hand grenades and opened fire on the students. By the time the horror ended,
25 people were dead; 21 of them were children.

Thirty years later, no one speaks of Ma'alot anymore. The dead children have been forgotten. Everyone knows Arafat's
name, but who ever recalls the names of his victims?

So let us recall them: Ilana Turgeman. Rachel Aputa. Yocheved Mazoz. Sarah Ben-Shim'on. Yona Sabag. Yafa Cohen.
Shoshana Cohen. Michal Sitrok. Malka Amrosy. Aviva Saada. Yocheved Diyi. Yaakov Levi. Yaakov Kabla. Rina Cohen.
Ilana Ne'eman. Sarah Madar. Tamar Dahan. Sarah Soper. Lili Morad. David Madar. Yehudit Madar. The 21 dead
children of Ma'alot -- 21 of the thousands of who died at Arafat's command.

Jeff Jacoby's e-mail address is jacoby@globe.com.
© Copyright 2004 Globe Newspaper Company.

Gepost door: karel | 11-11-04

De commentaren zijn gesloten.