The Veil of Maya

Anyone following the news can't but have noticed a substantial difference in reaction, from press, muslim organisations and diplomats alike to the french journos taken hostage by the really truly absolutely fringe element that is decapitational Islam.

This then begs the question: What is different? Why suddenly this outcry, where previously the tenor used to be "sad, but it was to be expected"?

The idea that somehow the French, by grace of having supported the regime of Saddam Hussein, acquired a magical aura of immunity for its nationals is so mind-boggingly stupid that it doesn't pass the giggle test. Indeed, french nationals have been killed as early as January this year.

Then the independent variable must be that the actual demand of the would-be decapitators is, relatively speaking, too far-out even for contemporary terrorism standards. It's one thing to demand withdrawal of troops from, or the cessation of any economic activity whatsoever with Iraq, it seems. But now, it would appear, the terrorists have gone too far and violated some unwritten causal connection rule that ought to govern terrorist demands.

But you must be stark raving mad or a journalist to begin with to think that terrorists have any use whatsoever for rules. Terrorism is what you can get away with.

When the French raise their hands to heaven and question the Gods why this ordeal is befalling them who have been always true and upright, it is not Job but the pharisees who come to mind. The terrorism was there all along, they just preferred not to see it so they called it "legitimate resistance".

Even now, the press, diplomats and muslim organisations refuse to acknowledge the presence of the elephant in the living room, and talk about mistakes. The hostagetakers have taken the wrong hostages. They are making the wrong demands. Clearly they will see this when we point this out to them and they will beat their chests, sigh, acknowledge the error of their ways and duly chastised resume the less-controversial killing of Jews and American Auxiliaries.

Or we could hunt them down and kill them all. Sometimes, simplicity has its advantages.

20:03 Gepost door GMT +1/+2 (c) 2006 The dog --- WHAT'S YOUR OPINION? / WAT IS UW GEDACHT? | Permalink | Commentaren (2) |  Facebook |


Juist gezien Wel noted Dof, u'r probably not the only one observing this. Only our press didn't notice it yet. Maybe in 20 years?

Gepost door: karel | 01-09-04

Klant is koning De Arabische afzetmarkt - overwegend islamitisch! - is nu eenmaal een groter afzetgebied voor Frans (en Francofoon-Belgisch?) wapentuig dan pakweg 'Israel' of 'the States'. Deze twee laatsten zijn bovendien ook nog eens de belangrijkste en rechtsteekse concurrenten van de Francofone wapenproducenten. Zou dat niet ook een heel klein beetje de 'heersende moraal' kunnen bepalen?
Weinig islamitische staten hebben een democratische cultuur. Wie daar dus kanonnen wil slijten houdt best de dictators, inclusief hun 'overtuigingen', te vriend.
Islam betekent dus vrede en de oorlogen zijn dus 'heilig', zeker voor de belangrijkste leveranciers van lucratief wapentuig: La France! La Belgique!
Dat geldt trouwens niet alleen voor islamitische klanten:
hoe groter de klant, hoe 'priller' de democratie, niewaar?

Hebben de Angelsaksen een andere moraal? Dan zullen ze ook wel overwegend een ander soort klanten hebben. Of ben ik te pessimistisch?

Gepost door: Edwin | 06-09-04

De commentaren zijn gesloten.